VETTASMS Group
Jun 2022 – Oct 2026 · 4 yrs 5 mos
Quality Assurance Tech Lead
Remote · Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais
PlaywrightTeam leadershipQuality assurance
// about
Professional summary
Quality engineering grounded in hands-on testing, thoughtful automation, and collaboration.
I’m a QA Tech Lead with 13 years of experience in software testing and quality assurance. My work has included organizations such as Vetta, Prime Control, UnitedHealth Group, Rentcars.com, Stefanini, and BRQ.
I work across test automation and quality practices, with a current focus on Playwright, TypeScript, Azure, GitHub, CI/CD, and AI tools including Claude, GPT, and DeepSeek. I value clear evidence, useful feedback, and testing that helps teams make confident decisions.
// experience
Career timeline
Six quality engineering roles across more than a decade. Titles, employers, dates, locations, and selected skills are based on the experience details shown on my LinkedIn profile.
PRIME CONTROL
Jan 2020 – Apr 2022 · 2 yrs 4 mos
Software Quality Analyst
Curitiba and Region, Brazil
Robot FrameworkWritingSoftware quality
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP
Sep 2017 – Aug 2019 · 2 yrs
Software Quality Analyst
Curitiba, Brazil
AgileWritingSoftware quality
RENTCARS.COM
Apr 2016 – Sep 2017 · 1 yr 6 mos
Software Quality Analyst
Curitiba and Region, Brazil
AndroidWritingSoftware quality
STEFANINI
Feb 2014 – Dec 2015 · 1 yr 11 mos
Software Quality Analyst
Curitiba, Brazil
WaterfallWritingSoftware quality
BRQ
Feb 2013 – Feb 2014 · 1 yr 1 mo
Junior Software Quality Analyst
Curitiba and Region, Brazil
SeleniumJavaSoftware quality
// skills
Technical toolkit
Quality engineering
Software testing and quality assurance across product development.
QA leadershipTest strategyQuality practicesCollaboration
Automation
Tools and technologies named in my profile and demonstrated in projects.
PlaywrightTypeScriptJavaScript
Delivery & integration
Workflow tools highlighted in my professional profile.
AzureGitHubCI/CDClaudeGPTDeepSeek
Languages
Languages listed in my LinkedIn profile.
PortugueseEnglish · Advanced
// automation
Selected quality case study
A practical exploration of the Buger Eats delivery registration flow, expanded into UI, API, and performance checks.
PERSONAL QA CASE STUDY
Buger Eats · Delivery registration
Started by exploring the home page and registration flow with Playwright MCP. The observations became documented scenarios and automated checks for field validation, CEP lookup, delivery selection, CNH upload, and the success confirmation.
14UI scenariosPlaywright · Chromium
03API checksViaCEP · HTTP + JSON
59.46 msRecorded response p95k6 · 5 VUs · 60 seconds
0%HTTP failuresRecorded smoke run
PlaywrightJavaScriptViaCEPk6GitHub Pages
The k6 numbers are from a 5-user smoke run, not a stress test or a claim about production capacity. The form displays a confirmation, but no registration backend was observed.
Related earlier Buger Eats project on GitHub ↗QUALITY FINDING · CEP LOOKUP
An unknown postal code exposed an interface issue.
For a CEP with no address, the form displayed
undefined/undefined in the city/state field and gave
no helpful error. The automated scenario records the behavior as
an expected failure until the application is corrected.
// github_actions
From commit to verified delivery
A real GitHub Actions pipeline runs the QA suites against the official Buger Eats site and publishes this portfolio after the UI and API gate passes.
CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION · CONTINUOUS DELIVERY
Automated quality pipeline
View workflow ↗
Workflow triggers
Pushes and pull requests to main / master, daily at 09:00 BRT, or manual dispatch.
REQUIRED DEPLOY GATE
UI & API validation
Playwright runs in Chromium against the official application.
- 14 UI scenarios
- 3 ViaCEP API checks
- HTML report retained as a workflow artifact
npm test
INDEPENDENT CHECK
Performance smoke test
k6 checks the home page and registration route on the official site.
- 5 virtual users · 60 seconds
- Response-time and request-failure thresholds
- Runs alongside UI/API; does not gate the Pages deploy
k6 run tests/performance/buger-eats.js
AFTER UI/API PASS · MAIN / MASTER
Open live portfolio ↗
Deploy portfolio to GitHub Pages
Pull requests validate changes without publishing. Pushes to the main branches deploy after the required UI/API job succeeds.
VERIFIED WORKFLOW RUN · OCT 22, 2026
17 UI/API tests passed · k6 p95 59.46 ms · 0% HTTP failures · deployment succeeded ↗
Performance values describe this smoke-test run only; they are not a capacity or production-performance guarantee.
REPORTS FOR REVIEW
The latest Playwright report is public here; run-specific screenshots and videos remain available in GitHub Actions artifacts for 14 days.
Open the readable report or inspect its structured data. Successful CI runs refresh these files before the Pages deployment.
// learning_path
Education & development
Academic foundations in software development, strengthened by a specialization in software testing and test planning.
Universidade Positivo
2017 — 2019
POSTGRADUATE
Software Tests
Specialization focused on software testing, test planning, and applying Agile concepts to quality practices.
FINAL PAPER
A test plan relating Agile concepts to the role of planning in reducing costs and defects and supporting a healthier project environment.
Universidade Positivo
2011 — 2014
UNDERGRADUATE
System Analysis and Development
IT undergraduate degree establishing a foundation in systems analysis and software development.
// contact
Let’s connect.
Explore my projects and professional profile. For contact details, please use the public contact options on LinkedIn.